CityEconomist

Home

Subscribe to Alerts

public_html

News 11-07

News 10-07

News 9 2007

News 8-07

News 7-07

News 2Q-07

News 1Q-07

News 2006

News 2005

City Ec Development

Ec Calculators, Imploders

Boston Economic History

NYC Economy 1995-2005

NYC Software/IT Jobs '99

Economics of Govt 10-06

Housing Bubble USA? '06

The Health-Care Econ '06

City Density and Destiny

Idea Cities Grow

How to Create Tech Jobs

New Orleans blog 12-05

Financial Markets

Personal Calculators

Business Calculators

FIN 674 Syllabus Fall 07

FIN 330 Syllabus Fall 07

Midterm Ans, Term Project

Fin Plans Save Marriages

Financing Small Business

Lessons of Sarbanes-Oxley

Financial Markets 2007

Financial Mkts--Cecchetti

S&L Crisis

Aid to Education '07

Governance, Taxation

Property Value Calculator

Gaffney:Why 20s NYC Grew

NYC Prop Assessments 07

Vickrey: 10 Ideas for NYC

CongestionPricingTestimon

Vickrey's 12 Principles

Vickrey 12 Brief

NYC MBP Forum 7-17-07

NYC Technology

NYC Public Health '07

Comparative Govt Analysis

COMP - 1973-1988

NYS Muni Ranks 2002

Workers Comp 10-06

Turkey: Economy and War

NYC and U.S. Budgets 2007

Sustainable Cities

Environmental branding

Green Buildings - CA

Transportation/Traffic

Workplace Branding

Muni Pension SRI Policy

JTM Reports 1988-1992

Oxford Manifesto 1993

Managing IP

John Tepper Marlin Books

Hilda van Stockum Books

Votes4Women - Scripts

Videos, Slide Shows

Photos of HvS and Family

Time Travel 1900-2004

Contact

Phone and email

JT Marlin bio

J Todd bio

KE Szczepaniak bio

H Seip bio

HOW DO THE LARGEST NEW YORK STATE COUNTIES AND CITIES PERFORM?

The Maxwell School Government Performance Project in 2002 rated 40 counties in the United States in five management areas. Five of the counties were in New York State. At the top end, the Project overall rated Erie and Westchester Counties C+, which is a failing grade in graduate school. At the low end, Nassau County rated the lowest, at D-, which is the next grade up from failure even for undergraduates. Since the data were collected in 2001 and Nassau has undergone some reforms, an update might carry Nassau County out of the cellar.

Two years before, the Project rated 35 cities, included two cities in NY State – New York City and Buffalo. The city ratings were published in 2000, based on data collected in 1999, when Rudy Giuliani was New York City's mayor.

Combining the New York State county and city numbers together in a single table - not something we asked the Project permission to do - New York City outperformed all of the NY counties in every area with only three exceptions. Westchester excelled in capital management, with a grade of A-, exceeding New York City’s B+. Also, Westchester equaled New York City in financial management, while Buffalo equaled New York City in information technology.

Large County (2002) and City (2000) Performance, New York State

Counties and Cities in NY State Aver- age Financial Manage-ment Human Resources Manage-ment Informa-tionTech-nology Capital Manage-ment Manag-ing for Results

Erie

C+

B-

C-

B

C+

C

Monroe

C

C

C-

D

B

C

Nassau

D-

F

D

D+

D-

F

Suffolk

C-

B-

C-

C

B-

F

Westchester

C+

B

D+

B-

A-

D+

Buffalo

C-

C

D

C

C-

D+

NYC

B

B

B-

B

B+

B

Sources: The Maxwell School Government Performance Project – County 2002 and the 2000 city survey.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:  U.S. County Average B-

The Project rates U.S. counties rated highly on financial reporting.  All but one county received the Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting.  Most of the county budgets are viewed as having a good structural balance (i.e., avoiding deficits on a year-to-year basis) and as having strong rainy day funds.  Only 15 percent of the counties have a legally required rainy day fund.  Nassau County, NY received the only F.

HUMAN RESOURCES: U.S. County Average C+

Many counties lack a unified county personnel system, meaning that departments may bid against one another for potential employees.  The tight job market of the 1990s forced many counties to improve their salaries and merit pay policies.  

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: County U.S. Average C+

The decentralized nature of county government has hampered introduction of technological efficiency. Different county offices  may use different IT systems. Counties are improving their web sites for two-way transactions.  The only A’s received in any management area were the IT grades of Fairfax (Va.) and Maricopa (Az.) Counties.  Allegheny and Monroe, N.Y. Counties tied for the lowest information technology grade, with a D.

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: U.S. County Average B-

New standards from the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 34 (GASB 34) requie counties to add information on assets and their maintenance needs.  Almost all counties have long-term capital improvement plans and solicit citizen input.  Baltimore, Fairfax, San Diego, and Westchester, NY Counties tied for the high score of A-.  Nassau County’s D- grade was the lowest of the 40 counties.

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: U.S. County Average C+

Only one-fourth of the counties evaluated have formal overall strategic plans, although more counties have departmental strategic planning. Budgets tend to be the main way that counties convey their goals and measure results.  Fairfax, Maricopa, and San Diego Counties received the highest grade of A-, while Nassau and Suffolk, NY Counties received the lowest grade of F.  

New content © 2006, 2007 by CityEconomist.

Website powered by Network Solutions®

Municipal governance