CityEconomist

Home

Business Calculators

Economic Calculators

Personal Calculators

Property Values

Government Strategy

1: Density=Destiny? 1-06

2:Density=Prosperity 1-06

3: Idea Cities Grow 1-06

4: Why Ideas=Growth 1-06

5:What Cities Can Do 1-06

6: Create Tech Jobs 1-06

Housing Bubble? 2-06

Talk NHS-Univ London 2-06

New Orleans blog 12-05

Comparative Govt Analysis

COMP - 1973-1988

Economics of Govt 10-06

NYS Muni Ranks 2002

Public Health 10-06

Workers Comp 10-06

NYC Prop Assessments 07

Local Govt Taxation

Gaffney:Why 20s NYC Grew

Vickrey: 10 Ideas for NYC

CongestionPricingTestimon

Vickrey's 12 Principles

Vickrey 12 Brief

Business Strategy, CSR

What Form of CSR Is Best?

Environmental branding

Business and Ecology

Workplace Branding

Fall06-Financial Markets

Financial Strategy

Lessons of Sarbanes-Oxley

Non-Financial Reporting

Socially Responsible Investing - Proxy Issues

Company/Product Ratings

JTM Reports 1988-1992

IP Management

Hilda van Stockum Books

Votes4Women - Scripts

Videos, Slide Shows

John Tepper Marlin Books

Photos of HvS and Family

Newsletter

March 2007

Contact

JT Marlin bio

H Seip bio

NYC HOUSING ASSESSMENTS IN JANUARY 2007

The January 2007 property assessment rolls for New York City showed a 19 percent increase over the values a year earlier. Given the national decline in housing prices, this was a surprise - an indication that the City has been immune to some of the downward pressures in the rest of the United States.

Assessments of NYC houses - as in the rest of the country (Indiana being the last state to move to market-value-based assessment) - are largely based the market values. However, in the case of apartments (including condos and condos) and commercial property, NYC practice is to consider potential income from rentals rather than actual sales prices.

The large increase in property values is an average. So the assessed value of the Grand Hyatt Hotel - which is based on factors contributing to income projections - rose more than 80 percent from a year earlier, whereas the overall averages for the four class was as follows:

Class 1 - 1-to-3-family homes - increase of 16.3 percent over January 2006 (based on sales figures)
Class 2 - apartment buildings (including most coops and condos) - increase of 26.3 percent (based on income potential)
Class 3 - utilities (Con Ed etc.) - decreased by 5.9 percent, partly because a New York State Court of Appeals decision required shifting some property to Class 4
Class 4 - commercial property - increased 22.3 percent, partly because some property was shifted to the class from Clas 3.

 
New content © 2006, 2007 by CityEconomist.

Metrics for business and city sustainability