CityEconomist

Home

Subscribe to Alerts

public_html

News 11-07

News 10-07

News 9 2007

News 8-07

News 7-07

News 2Q-07

News 1Q-07

News 2006

News 2005

City Ec Development

Ec Calculators, Imploders

Boston Economic History

NYC Economy 1995-2005

NYC Software/IT Jobs '99

Economics of Govt 10-06

Housing Bubble USA? '06

The Health-Care Econ '06

City Density and Destiny

Idea Cities Grow

How to Create Tech Jobs

New Orleans blog 12-05

Taxation, Governance

Property Value Calculator

Gaffney:Why 20s NYC Grew

NYC Prop Assessments 07

Vickrey: 10 Ideas for NYC

CongestionPricingTestimon

Vickrey's 12 Principles

Vickrey 12 Brief

NYC MBP Forum 7-17-07

NYC Technology

NYC Public Health '07

Comparative Govt Analysis

COMP - 1973-1988

NYS Muni Ranks 2002

Workers Comp 10-06

Turkey: Economy and War

NYC and U.S. Budgets 2007

Sustainable Cities

Environmental branding

Green Buildings - CA

Transportation/Traffic

Workplace Branding

Muni Pension SRI Policy

JTM Reports 1988-1992

Oxford Manifesto 1993

Personal Finance

Personal Calculators

Business Calculators

FIN 674 Syllabus Fall 07

FIN 330 Syllabus Fall 07

Midterm Ans, Term Project

Fin Plans Save Marriages

Financing Small Business

Lessons of Sarbanes-Oxley

Financial Markets 2007

Financial Mkts--Cecchetti

S&L Crisis

Aid to Education '07

Managing IP

John Tepper Marlin Books

Hilda van Stockum Books

Votes4Women - Scripts

Videos, Slide Shows

Photos of HvS and Family

Time Travel 1900-2004

Contact

Phone and email

JT Marlin bio

J Todd bio

KE Szczepaniak bio

H Seip bio

VICKREY’S TWELVE PRINCIPLES FOR EFFICIENT CONGESTION PRICING (1992)

 

Brief summary of Prof. William S. Vickrey’s "Principles for Efficient Congestion Pricing." A longer version may be found at http://tinyurl.com/277uxc.

  1. Charges should equal or exceed the marginal social cost of each trip.
  2. Charges should vary in sufficiently small increment to avoid creating mini-peaks.
  3. Marginal social cost should be determined by the amount of time a vehicle is in the congestion queue. A vehicle arriving early in a congestion queue causes more congestion than one arriving late.
  4. Charges are optimally based on trip segments rather than passage beyond a point.
  5. Charges are optimally based on actual congestion rather than a predetermined schedule. Ideally drivers could be warned to stay away from certain areas where accidents had occurred and would be penalized for ignoring the warning.
  6. All vehicles should be charged including trucks, emergency and media vehicles, and the vehicles of “public officials and diplomats.” The City should be aware, “even if this is only an accounting transfer,” of the congestion it causes.
  7. Taxicabs should be charged and the charge should appear on the meter so that the passenger pays.
  8. On-street parking spaces should be charged for based on the percentage of spaces on the block that are occupied. If 5 percent or fewer spaces are vacant, the charge should be high. If 20 percent or more spaces are vacant, the charge should decline to little or nothing.
  9. Parking charges could be assessed by assigning each vehicle an account or card.
  10. Or parking charges could be assessed using parking ticket vending machines, which will display an hourly charged based on the percentage of spaces that are vacant, which can be computed by the machine.
  11. Delivery vehicles require loading bays and a system that imposes extra charges when they double-park.
  12. The majority of the population that benefits from congestion pricing – and will see faster buses and emergency vehicles – should support it strongly to offset those who feel they lose the most.
New content © 2006, 2007 by CityEconomist.

Website powered by Network Solutions®

Municipal governance